Public Utility Commissions have abdicated their fiduciary duties to the public!


By AL Whitney © copyround 2018
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and PeopleforSafeTechnologies is acknowledged.

All Americans need to know that the Smart Meters being installed (“deployed”) across the country are not safe and that neither the Public Utility Commissions nor the power companies are assuring that they are.

Video clip from the documentary Take Back Your Power:

This is just more confirmation that the federal agency network is not there to protect the public from harm or injury.  All of them (FCC, FTC, EPA, FDA, etc.) are protecting industry from liability for their actions. They are wolves in sheep’s clothing!

Go to and purchase a copy of this incredibly important documentary. You won’t regret it.

To remove your presumed consent to having a smart meter installed on your home or business, please review this information.


Doctors Call for Protection from Radiofrequency Radiation


Declaration: Doctors Call for Protection from Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure

Date of Issuance: July 9, 2014


Physicians Call for Health Canada to Provide:

  1. Wireless safety standards that are more protective of the health of Canadians; and
  2. Guidelines and resources to assist Canadian physicians in assessing and managing health problems related to microwave radiation.

There is considerable evidence and research from various scientific experts that exposure to microwave radiation from wireless devices; Wi-Fi, smart meters and cell towers can have an adverse impact on human physiological function. [1] [2]  Many recent and emerging studies from university departments and scientific sources throughout the world support the assertion that energy from wireless devices may be causatively linked to various health problems including reproductive compromise, develop mental impacts, hormonal dysregulation and cancer. In fact, in 2011 the World Health Organization listed microwave radiation as a Class 2B possible carcinogen. [3] and subsequent research strengthened the evidence that a stronger designation may be justified. [4] [5] [6]

Out of sincere concern for the health of Canadians at all stages of life – from the developing fetus through childhood and into adulthood – we respectfully request that: Continue reading

The FCC protects industry – not people!

By AL Whitney © copyround 2018
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and PeopleforSafeTechnologies is acknowledged.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is NOT a health protection organization. The FCC is a corporation listed on Dun and Bradstreet (like ALL the so-called ‘government agencies’) and is headquartered in WASHINGTON DC. The employees of the FCC DO NOT work for the American people!!!! Their job is NOT to protect Americans from harmful Smart Meters and/or other wireless technology. The job of the FCC is to give cover (plausible deniability) and credibility to the wireless industry and protect them from lawsuits.

The following, directly from the FCC website, is a good example of ‘word crafting’ aka propaganda. Spin words and phrases are used ad nauseum. However, the first sentence tells it all.

Current Exposure Limits from the FCC web site:
“While there is no federally developed national standard for safe levels of exposure to radiofrequency (RF) energy, many federal agencies have addressed this important issue. In addition to the Federal Communications Commission, federal health and safety agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) have been actively involved in monitoring and investigating issues related to RF exposure. For example, the FDA has issued guidelines for safe RF emission levels from microwave ovens, and it continues to monitor exposure issues related to the use of certain RF devices such as cellular telephones. NIOSH conducts investigations and health hazard assessments related to occupational RF exposure.” Continue reading

Resonance Beings of Frequencies

This is a brilliant must-see documentary. It is especially important as the number of wireless devices we bring into our personal space keep growing! We are actually paying to damage our own health.

We must abandon the notion that our so-called government protects our health and welfare. See: Smart Meters and Regulatory Agencies

Smart meters & ‘regulatory’ agencies

By AL Whitney © copyround 2018
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and PeopleforSafeTechnologies is acknowledged.

AEP logo.JPGAnyone who thinks power companies like AEP function any different than any other corporation is pretty naive. The fact that many of us personally know good folks who work for them, doesn’t alter the nature of the corporate beast.

Short video clip summation of the serious problems with Smart Meters:

In the video clip Dr David Carpenter, public health physician, stated that “regulatory agencies” can no longer deny the public health issues related to Smart Meters. Dr. Carpenter is unaware of the real role regulatory agencies play in our society. Many big corporations cite government regulatory agencies in their defense against prosecution for the harm they cause. If the ‘agency’ declared it safe, than it must be so, right? This is called plausible deniability. In the case of the Smart Meter, the electric companies cite the FCC in their defense. Strange since the FCC was not established to evaluate health concerns!

FACT: The polluters hide behind the EPA, Monsanto hides behind the USDA, and Big Pharma hides behind the FDA. The list goes on and on and the story is the same.

Program On Corporations Law And Democracy (POCLAD) exposed the scam that is federal regulatory agencies long ago (1998). Jane Anne Morris wrote a great article for them: //

  • “Regulatory agencies are the corporations’ response to people’s calls for democracy and self-governance. Corporate officials who once hired Pinkerton’s goons to do their dirty work and protect them from an activist public can now rest assured that much of that burden has been assumed by regulatory agencies. They work as the barriers they were designed to be.”

How can the American public put a stop to the pollution of our air, water and soil if we don’t understand the obstacles that have been put in our way? We won’t have any success whatsoever unless we expose the regulatory system behind which all polluters and big corporations hide. By the way, the system was also designed to destroy small independent businesses via regulations small business owners can’t afford to comply with.

More from the POCLAD article:
“It is difficult to say which is more discouraging: that the criticisms have changed very little over time, or, that the suggested changes are clearly unequal to the task. Some of the recurring criticisms are that

  1. regulatory agencies have too much discretionary authority, which is almost invariably abused;
  2. they combine legislative, executive, and judicial power in one place; [Constitutional attorney Jonathon Emords explained how they currently function on Coast to Coast in July 2015. Attorney Jonathon Emords interview]
  3. their personnel and outlook reflect the views of the corporations they are supposed to be regulating; [like Monsanto’s former attorney Michael Taylor]
  4. since individuals and small businesses can’t afford the time and expense to fully participate, large corporations dominate; and
  5. procedural considerations are so intricate and demanding that matters of fairness, justice, and overall policy questions, not to mention common sense, are ruled irrelevant if they come up at all.”

Government agencies were not created to keep a watchful eye over the public’s interests! In fact, the ‘regulatory agencies’ are doing exactly what they were created to do – advance political agendas, protect big corporation’s interests and eliminate competition!

To protect our health and our natural environment (whether you live in a city or in the country) we are going to have to become active and expose the ‘agency’ system as a fraud and work to discredit them all.


I absolutely understand that many good people are employed by AEP, and so-called government agencies. The good employees are not the problem, the corrupted system is! In fact, the ‘regulatory agencies’ are doing exactly what they were created to do – protect big corporations from liability and eliminate competition! Let’s not forget that corporations “Have no soul to save and no body to incarcerate”. Flesh and blood people MUST control corporations . . . not the other way around. Another business model is possible!


Health Effects from Cell Phone Tower Radiation


“To claim there is no adverse effect from phone towers flies in the face of a large body of evidence.”
Dr. Neil Cherry, biophysicist.

Health Effects from Cell Phone Tower Radiation

by Karen J. Rogers

The safety of cell phone towers is the subject of extensive scientific debate. There is a growing body of scientific evidence that the electromagnetic radiation they emit, even at low levels, is dangerous to human health.

The cell phone industry is expanding quickly, with over 100,000 cell phone towers now up across the U.S., which is expected to increase ten-fold over the next five years. The industry has set what they say are ” safe levels” of radiation exposure, but there are a growing number of doctors, physicists, and health officials who strongly disagree, and foresee a public health crisis. Continue reading

BioInitiative 2012 exposes the dangers of EMF


The BioInitiative 2012 Report was prepared by 29 authors from ten countries, ten holding medical degrees (MDs), 21 PhDs, and three MsC, MA or MPHs. Among the authors were three former presidents of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, and five full members of BEMS. One distinguiished author was the Chair of the Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation. Another is a Senior Advisor to the European Environmental Agency.

PUBLICATION DATE: December 31, 2012


WHAT IS IT: A report by 29 independent scientists and health experts from around the world about possible risks from wireless technologies and electromagnetic fields. It updates the BioInitiative 2007 Report.

WHAT IT COVERS: The science, public health, public policy and global response to the growing health issue of chronic exposure to electromagnetic fields and radiofrequency radiation in the daily life of billions of people around the world. Covers brain tumor risks from cell phones, damage to DNA and genes, effects on memory, learning, behavior, attention, sleep disruption and cancer and neurological diseases like Alzheimers. Effects on sperm and miscarriage (fertility and reproduction), effects of wireless on the brain development of the fetus and infant, and effects of wireless classrooms on children and adolescents is addressed. Mechanisms for biological action and public health responses in other countries are discussed. Therapeutic use of very low intensity EMF and RFR are addressed.

WHAT IS NEW: This update covers about 1800 new studies reporting bioeffects and adverse health effect of electromagnetic fields (power lines, electrical wiring, appliances and hand-held devices) – and wireless technologies (cell and cordless phones, cell towers, Wi-Fi, wireless laptops, wireless routers, baby monitors, surveillance systems, wireless utility meters (smart meters), etc.

Visit the BioInitiztive 2012 web site

American Academy of Environmental Medicine issues smart meter warning!




January 19, 2012

Dear [public utility] Commissioners:

The Board of the American Academy of Environmental Medicine opposes the installation of wireless “smart meters” in homes and schools based on a scientific assessment of the current medical literature (references available on request). Chronic exposure to wireless radiofrequency radiation is a preventable environmental hazard that is sufficiently well documented to warrant immediate preventative public health action. Continue reading

Scientists Call on Government to Protect Public from Wireless Radiation Exposure

More than 50 scientists from 18 nations called on government to minimize the public’s exposure to the radiation emitted by wireless devices including cell and cordless phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters and baby monitors.

Press Release Distribution
Jul. 9, 2014

BERKELEY, Calif. – Today, fifty-four scientists from 18 nations who study the effects of radiofrequency (RF) radiation submitted a declaration to Health Canada calling on government’s need to minimize the public’s exposure to this pollutant which is emitted by wireless devices including cell phones, cordless phones, Wi-Fi, broadcast antennas, smart meters, and baby monitors.

The scientists signed a public declaration in which they raise serious concerns regarding Safety Code 6 guidelines finding them obsolete and inadequate to protect the public from RF radiation. The regulatory standards based upon these guidelines allow for wireless devices that emit RF radiation at levels that have been found in many studies to cause cancer, DNA damage, stress responses, and other harmful effects in humans. The document notes that the World Health Organization classified electromagnetic fields at both extremely low frequency in 2001 and RF ranges in 2011 as “possibly carcinogenic to humans.”

Currently, RF exposure guidelines in four countries. China, Russia, Italy, and Switzerland, based on biological effects, are 100 times more stringent than Canadian (and U.S.) guidelines.

Continue reading